Proof
Proof, with the math shown.
One fully verified build. We'd rather show you one honestly than ten vaguely.
Most agency case studies are testimonials with a percentage attached. This one shows how the number was calculated, what the system does, and where it deliberately stops.
$250. You leave with what's slowing you down, what it costs, and what the fix is. It credits in full toward the first work you hire us for.
What's the catch?
We charge because a free session has to end in a pitch to pay for itself.
Some of what we find, you can do yourself. We'll show you how. It's your system. You deserve to understand how it runs. What's genuinely beyond you, we build, and the $250 credits toward it. If you'd rather not touch any of it, we'll handle the whole thing.
How the number was measured
~97% success rate measured across roughly 300 real estimates over five months in production.
Sharkitect Digital has one fully documented and verified case study: an estimate automation built for an award-winning, family-owned flooring and remodeling company in the Kansas City area. It returned about 37 hours a month, roughly 184 hours across the first five months. It handled about 300 estimates at a 97% automation success rate. And a person approved every estimate before it reached a customer.
Case study, system integration
37 hours a month back for a KC flooring contractor
Every estimate was being built by hand (measuring rooms, doing square-footage math, applying waste percentages) then retyped line by line from Monday.com into QuickBooks Online. We connected the two systems they already paid for.
Why there's only one on this page
Because it's the one we can prove.
We could fill this page. Every agency has a folder of engagements that went fine. It's easy to write "streamlined operations for a regional contractor" and attach a percentage nobody will check.
We've decided not to do that. The reason is partly principle and mostly practical. Find one padded number, and every other number on the site becomes worthless.
So the rule here is simple. A case study goes on this page when the client has approved it. The numbers must be measured, not estimated. And we have to show the method used to arrive at them.
That's a slower page to fill. It's a much better one to be judged on.
We're also not going to pretend our newer systems have five years of published results behind them. Where our proof is thinner, the relevant service page says so in those words.
What we'll publish, and what we won't
- Measured, not estimated. The flooring number came from a conservative flat 37.5 minutes of manual work per estimate, multiplied by real volume. We then cross-checked it against a single month. That March check came in at 39 hours, in line with the ~37/month average.
- Client-approved, always. This client asked to stay anonymous. We honor that even though naming them would help us. That's why you'll read "an award-winning, family-owned flooring and remodeling company in the Kansas City area" rather than a logo.
- No invented quotes. We won't write a testimonial and attribute it to a client who didn't say it. If there's no signed-off quote, there's no quote.
- Savings that survived the slow season. The flooring result held through the slow months. That matters. A number measured only during a busy season is a seasonal spike wearing a case study's clothes.
Want to know what your number would be?
The Assessment produces the same kind of math for your operation: where the hours go, what it appears to cost, and what we'd fix first.
$250. You leave with what's slowing you down, what it costs, and what the fix is. It credits in full toward the first work you hire us for.